- WINRUNNER TESTING TOOL INSTALL
- WINRUNNER TESTING TOOL CODE
- WINRUNNER TESTING TOOL PROFESSIONAL
- WINRUNNER TESTING TOOL WINDOWS
Ensuring that events are properly firing, and that values are being appropriately returned from your business objects, that's all unit tests. All of that is what your humans should be doing. Checking to make sure things "look right", or testing that you can see certain elements, etc. There are parts of your GUI that you can't automate. The parts of your GUI tests that you want to automate should be automated below the UI.
WINRUNNER TESTING TOOL CODE
You might say, but I'm using some static classes/methods that can only exist in my UI, wrap those with an adapter and utilize that interface in order to make your code testable. So you say, but what if I want to test that such and such happens when a button is clicked? The method that is called when that button is clicked should call out to another class that actually does the thinking. Place as little logic as possible in the UI and test everything below it. It won't do e-mail naitevly, but if you integrate with TestDirector/Qualit圜enter, you can setup through there, along with automating the kick-off of your scripts, and parameterizing data right from there (which is nice to send back to testers to have populate data without being involved in the script itseld).ĭesktop or Web apps alike have the same testing pattern here (I've worked in both). So you could use a case statement to populate your output values based on your results. And as for reporting, QTP will do simple reporting of pass/fail/warning on tags that you put in, along with custom data you can input. And as for simplicity of use, at my old job, we would have business or system testers create simple smoke scripts, then I would take them and code them for more in-depth testing (multiple data values, error checking, etc). If you are used to WinRunner, and know VBScript (not so much TSL), then I would definantly look at QTP.Īs far as your other requirements, QTP also has the Spy feature, like WinRunner, that will list all properties and actions you can perform on objects. Checks for text next to boxes can be done with simple compares using the datasheet in QTP. Simple GUI checks can be done through the QTP interface with minimal, if any, custom VB code. It has a lot of the same functionality as WinRunner, but without a lot of code.
WINRUNNER TESTING TOOL PROFESSIONAL
Yes, using the STAF framework you can post results to a web server, send out emails, etc.Ĭoming from a strong Mercury/HP background, I would highly recommend using QuickTest Professional for your GUI testing. Some QA folks can write the tests, some struggle.ħ) have reporting tools, including email of individual users.
![winrunner testing tool winrunner testing tool](https://present5.com/presentation/e83750d820a88471bd8cd26ed08dd01b/image-12.jpg)
Yes, you can wait for a UI object to appear, disapper, to have a value, for a value to be changed, etc.Ħ) intuitive enough so non-programmers can create the scripts. Except for maybe the "Image-based Testing" option.ĥ) be able to 'spy' on individual static text boxes, etc. Yes, since it's looking "under the covers" at the UI objects and not the screen.
![winrunner testing tool winrunner testing tool](https://www.wisdomjobs.com/tutorials/toolbar-of-win-runner-14435.png)
I wrote an Excel add-in that our testers use to write their tests that simplifies things a little bit.Ĥ) work with different screen resolutions automatically. Yes, but as mentioned, it's not the most robust programming language.
WINRUNNER TESTING TOOL INSTALL
I have a proof-of-concept test that uses STAF to start a VM image from a pool of images, install the application under test, run the RRAFS test, and put the results on a web server for others to get at. The SAFS framework integrates with the STAF framework, which will allow you to automate the execution of your tests.
![winrunner testing tool winrunner testing tool](https://enlyft.com/tech/static/images/static_charts/hp-winrunner.png)
I don't know how the "Image-Based Testing" implementation drives the tests, but I'd guess it can also work with MFC.
![winrunner testing tool winrunner testing tool](http://lh5.ggpht.com/_vz6w6628a_4/Ss4tBqTs_KI/AAAAAAAADNs/xeeWt-DqE-8/clip_image004_thumb[2].jpg)
If that tool can interact with MFC apps, then the framework can. The SAFS framework uses a 3rd party "record-playback" tool to drive the tests, like Rational Robot or Mercury WinRunner. To address your individual requirements above:ġ) The tool has to work with MFC (non-negotiable).
WINRUNNER TESTING TOOL WINDOWS
It's sort of like "programming" in Windows Batch language, but for tests ) It's not very robust, in terms of language constructs, but with some effort you can do anything you need to. That said, the language of the framework is cumbersome and takes getting used to. I've tested four releases of a web application developed by two different teams (one team using classic ASP, one using ASP.NET) and I only had to change the application map of my UI objects, the tests themselves didn't need to change. This framework does a nice job of seperating the UI implementation from the test scripts. There are also SAFS implementations for WinRunner (WRAFS) and it looks like they have a new "Image-Based Testing" implementation, which I'm not familiar with. We use the SAFS framework for Rational Robot (RRAFS).